TigerDirect Back to School 2009


Current News

  • Sherrod Will Sue Andrew Breitbart

    Wrongly fired USDA employee plans legal action after being labeled “racist” by misleading video.

    Shirley Sherrod says she will file a lawsuit against conservative blogger Andrew Breitbart for posting a video that wrongly portrayed her as racist. The former U.S. Agriculture employee told a packed session at the annual convention of the National Association of Black Journalists in San Diego that she would “definitely” take legal action against Breitbart.

    Sherrod said she was sorry he was not at the convention because she had some questions she wanted to ask him. She said she believed Breitbart “had to know” that the video he released wildly distorted her views and her intentions. The complete video showed that Sherrod was talking about racial reconciliation, the opposite of what Breitbart’s heavily edited video implied.

    Sherrod, whose father was killed by a white farmer when she was a teenager, said that her generation had made a mistake in trying to shield younger Americans — black and white — from the pain and suffering associated with the civil rights movement. She said she had invited President Barack Obama, who called her after she was offered a new job at USDA, to come to southwest Georgia to see the struggles that continue there. Sherrod said she had not yet decided whether to take an offer to return to the federal agency, which she described as having many internal problems.

    Asked to reflect on the progress that has been made during her 45 years of struggle for change, Sherrod said too many young people were more concerned about joining the mainstream and not upsetting the status quo. “We have pushed things under the rug,” said Sherrod.

    Sherrod said the new surge of hostility around race was the result of pent-up resentments that are now surfacing. A lot of the changes in the last decades came through litigation, she said. “A lot of changes were forced on people legally,” she said, “but we didn’t have the minds change.”

    Joel Dreyfuss is managing editor of The Root.

    Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
    tell a friend
    about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.
  • Tea Party Leaders Speak Out On Racism In National On Air Town Hall Broadcast

    By: TheLoop21

    National and local Tea Party leaders will answer charges that tea party groups are racist or harbor racist elements. They will discuss theNAACP resolution condemning them for not denouncing racists within tea party affiliates, and tell why they accuse the NAACP of playing the race card. The Tea Party leaders will tell how and what steps if any they are taking to purge racist elements within the various affiliates. The phone lines will be open for listeners nationally to dialogue with tea party leaders on racism and their party.

    The on-air town hall airs on Hutchinson Report on Saturday, July 31, from Noon to 1:00 PM on KPFK-Radio 90.7 FM Los Angeles and streamed on kpfk.org. It will be videocast on hutchinsonreport.tv from Noon to 2:00PM.

    “This is the first national radio on air town hall that exclusively features tea party leaders discussing race and racism and their party, “says Hutchinson Report Host Earl Ofari Hutchinson, “This is a milestone in broadcasting. It will lift and broaden the public dialogue on the tea party and the thorny issue of race.”

    Tune in To The Hutchinson Report
    on
    KTYM Radio 1460 AM

    Fridays 9:30 to 10:00 AM PST

    Saturdays 9:00 to 9:30 PM PST
    Streamed on http://www.ktym.com
    KPFK Radio Los Angeles 90.7 FM
    Saturdays Noon to 1:00 PM PST
    Streamed on
    http://www.kpfk.org/programs/181-hutchinson-report.html
    Follow us on TWITTER:
    http://twitter.com/earlhutchinson
    View The Hutchinson Report TV
    on
    ustream.tv

    Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
    tell a friend
    about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.
  • Judge rules to block provisions of Ariz. law

    Ruling sets up court battle as state fights to enact measure

    by JONATHAN J. COOPER, MICHELLE PRICE

    PHOENIX — A federal judge stepped into the fight over Arizona’s immigration law at the last minute Wednesday, blocking the heart of the measure and defusing a confrontation between police and thousands of activists that had been building for months.

    Coming just hours before the law was to take effect, the ruling isn’t the end.

    Salvador Reza speaks outside Phoenix City Hall on Tuesday in Phoenix. Community members from the Puente Movement were petitioning the city to not enforce Arizona's immigration bill, SB 1070, which takes effect Thursday.

    It sets up a lengthy legal battle that could end up before the Supreme Court — ensuring that a law that reignited the immigration debate, inspired similar measures nationwide, created fodder for political campaigns and raised tensions with Mexico will stay in the spotlight.

    Protesters who gathered at the state Capitol and outside the U.S. Embassy in Mexico City cheered when they heard the news. The governor, the law’s authors and anti-illegal immigration groups vowed to fight on.

    “It’s a temporary bump in the road,” Gov. Jan Brewer said.

    U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton will now have to decide a question as old as the nation itself: Does federal law trump state law? She indicated in her ruling that the federal government’s case has a good chance at succeeding.

    The Clinton appointee said the controversial sections should be put on hold until the courts resolve the issues, including sections that required officers to check a person’s immigration status while enforcing other laws.

    Key points
    Bolton delayed provisions that required immigrants to carry their papers and banned illegal immigrants from soliciting employment in public places — a move aimed at day laborers. In addition, she blocked officers from making warrantless arrests of suspected illegal immigrants for crimes that can lead to deportation.

    “Requiring Arizona law enforcement officials and agencies to determine the immigration status of every person who is arrested burdens lawfully present aliens because their liberty will be restricted while their status is checked,” Bolton wrote.

    Continue Reading…

    Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
    tell a friend
    about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.
  • Can Obama sell Democrats’ legislative victories?

    President Obama raises his hands after signing the financial reform bill into law on Wednesday.

    By Ed Hornick, CNN

    Washington (CNN) — A legislative win is a win — but not necessarily when it comes to swaying voters facing the worst economic conditions since the Great Depression.

    High unemployment and fears over an ever-increasing federal debt are weighing heavily on Americans. That could drown out President Obama’s message as he heads out on the campaign trail to tout Democrats’ legislative wins: health care reform, financial regulatory reform and economic stimulus projects, among others.

    “Right now he is facing an uphill battle,” said Vanderbilt University political scientist John Geer. “I don’t think there’s much that can be done about that. He’ll sharpen the message. But when economies are soft, incumbents have a tough time.”

    And members of Congress, bracing for a tough election, got a frank assessment Wednesday of where the economy is headed.

    Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke warned that the economic outlook remains “unusually uncertain.” But he said that while there are growing signs of weakness in the nation’s economic recovery, Bernanke and other top Federal Reserve officials still expect “continued moderate growth, a gradual decline in the unemployment rate, and subdued inflation over the next several years.”

    Read more on Bernanke’s assessment

    In addition to championing Democrats’ legislative wins, Obama is being urged to continue to go after Republicans — and lay out an argument that conditions in the country won’t improve if the opposition takes control of Congress after the midterm election.

    So far, that strategy is being employed.

    Obama recently traveled to Missouri to help fellow Democrat Sen. Robin Carnahan in her crucial Senate race.

    “The last thing we should do is go back to the very ideas that got us into this mess,” Obama said at the campaign event. “That’s the choice you are going to face in November. … a choice between falling backward or moving forward.”

    A CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll would seem to support that strategy, according to CNN Polling Director Keating Holland.

    Continue Reading…

    Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
    tell a friend
    about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.
  • Black racism: A real problem, or pure politics?

    By theGrio

    An unidentified member of the New Black Panthers, left, films a protester with a bullhorn during a protest between hundreds of black and white protesters in Paris, Texas, Tuesday, July 21, 2009. The conflict began with a march through downtown by about 100 black activists who were protesting the state's handling of the case of a black man who was run over and dragged by a vehicle. (AP Photo/LM Otero)

    Is black racism a real problem? Or is it pure politics?

    Shirley Sherrod was dismissed from her Agriculture Department job because remarks she made about her dealings with a white farmer almost a quarter century ago were perceived as racist. She was offered her job back Wednesday because a full viewing of that speech showed it to be a tale of racial reconciliation.

    But put aside the furor and confusion over the employment of the black woman who headed the USDA’s rural development office in Georgia. The Sherrod affair brings to the fore a simmering debate over whether black racism is cause for concern in America under its first black president.

    During the campaign, Barack Obama was forced to address the blistering racial remarks of his former pastor. Since then, there have been complaints that Barack Obama presides over an administration that is racial, not post-racial — when he supported a black Harvard professor who was arrested by a white police officer, or when the Justice Department dismissed most charges against a group of black militants accused of intimidating voters.

    “If the Justice Department is really not interested in pursuing cases against blacks who violate whites’ civil rights and only go after whites who violate blacks’ rights, that is a major problem,” says William Stogner, a 46-year-old telecommunications technician who lives in St. Louis.

    Growing up in the 1970s, Stogner was often called “cracker” by black kids in his grandparents’ East St. Louis neighborhood. Last April, while walking to his car after a tea party rally, he says he heard the same epithet from a group of young black men. To Stogner, black and white racism are equivalent: “To me it’s bad no matter where it originates.”

    But to some conservatives, there is something special about black racism: It is invisible in the liberal media, and perpetrated by the Obama administration. While white racism is highly publicized, they say, black racism gets a pass.

    “The sheer hypocrisy is maddening to me, and is a terrible, terrible double standard,” said conservative radio host Mike Gallagher.

    Andrew Breitbart clearly sees black racism as an issue. He’s the conservative blogger who posted the clip from Sherrod’s 1986 speech to an NAACP meeting that set off the contretemps. He said the NAACP, in accusing the tea party movement of racism, was glossing over its own bigotry.

    In the video, he wrote, “Sherrod’s racist tale is received by the NAACP audience with nodding approval and murmurs of recognition and agreement. Hardly the behavior of the group now holding itself up as the supreme judge of another group’s racial tolerance.”

    To Sherrod, Breitbart was just playing his own racist card: He created “a racist thing that could unite even more the racist people out there,” she told the liberal website Media Matters.

    Imani Perry, a professor at Princeton’s Center for African American Studies, said some conservatives are manipulating white fears for political advantage.

    “I think many white Americans are fearful that with Obama in the White House, and the diversity in his appointments, that the racial balance of power is shifting. And that’s frightening both because people always are afraid to give up privilege, and because of the prospect of a black-and-brown backlash against a very ugly history,” Perry said.

    Some liberals have long maintained that racism requires power, and so black people can’t be racist. Obama’s election undercut the first argument and made the specter of black racism appear more threatening.

    Of course, the black power movement of the 1960s and 1970s — “We must wage guerrilla warfare on the honky white man,” said H. Rap Brown — was plenty threatening.

    Joe Hicks was a black nationalist and proudly demonized whites back then. Now a conservative Republican and vice president of Community Advocates Inc. in Los Angeles, which works to improve race relations, Hicks says today that black racism is not widespread: “The average black person doesn’t dislike white people.”

    But he does believe it has become more prevalent than white racism. “Bigotry among white Americans has been driven to the margins of society. White people fear being called a racist more than anything else. But as white people have slowly moved away from viewing themselves in a racialized way, black people have maintained their sense of racial consciousness,” which sometimes leads to bias, he said.

    Gallagher, the radio host, says the appearance of anti-white bias at the Agriculture or Justice Department “creates white racists.”

    “White people sit around, and they get angry and they think this is the world they live in, and it’s not fair. I hear it in the frustration of my callers,” he said.

    “White America understands by now, you’d better be very careful in the way you treat people of color. In this history of this country that’s great advice. That’s as it should be. We’ve had a shameful past,” he said. “Now the fear is that the pendulum has swung so far the other way, that white people mind their P’s and Q’s and don’t say anything that can be perceived as racist, but blacks can talk about hurting people.”

    Perry, the Princeton professor, pointed out that blacks have 10 cents of wealth for every dollar possessed by whites.

    “We can hardly say whites as a group are suffering under the weight of racial discrimination. That said, we do have to find ways of talking about race with more openness but also with greater sensitivity,” she said.

    “There is a lot of work for everyone to do in this regard, and people of color are no exception.”

    Jesse Washington covers race and ethnicity for The Associated Press. He is reachable at jwashington(at)ap.org.

    Copyright 2010 The Associated Press.

    Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
    tell a friend
    about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

Politics

You’ll Never Believe What This White House Is Missing

By MAUREEN DOWD

The Obama White House is too white.

It has Barack Obama, raised in the Hawaiian hood and Indonesia, and Valerie Jarrett, who spent her early years in Iran.

But unlike Bill Clinton, who never needed help fathoming Southern black culture, Obama lacks advisers who are descended from the central African-American experience, ones who understand “the slave thing,” as a top black Democrat dryly puts it.

The first black president should expand beyond his campaign security blanket, the smug cordon of overprotective white [...]

[ Read More → ]

Our Community

Congress narrows gap in cocaine sentences

By JIM ABRAMS (AP)

WASHINGTON — Congress has changed a quarter-century-old law that has sent tens of thousands of blacks to prison for crack cocaine convictions while giving far more lenient treatment to those, mainly whites, caught with the same amount of the drug in powder form.

House passage of what was called the “fair sentencing act” sends the legislation to President Barack Obama for his signature.

The measure alters a 1986 law, enacted at the height of the crack cocaine epidemic, under [...]

[ Read More → ]

Your Health

The Patient’s Bill of Rights:

“Starting in September, some of the worst abuses will be banned forever. No more discriminating against children with pre-existing conditions. No more retroactively dropping somebody’s policy when they get sick if they made an unintentional mistake on an application. No more lifetime limits or restrictive annual limits on coverage. Those days are over.” – PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA

President Obama announced a Patient’s Bill of Rights made possible under health reform—a basic set of consumer protections that end some of the health [...]

[ Read More → ]

   
Copyright © The Urban Politician. All rights reserved.

Videos, Slideshows and Podcasts by Cincopa Wordpress Plugin